Heidi Tanner, aged 59 years presents with shortness of breath. She collapsed at work yesterday after exerting herself but did not go to hospital as she hates doctors and hospitals. However, today she presents because she feels quite odd. On examination she appears short of breathe and clinically is in heart failure with a loud ejection systolic murmur.
History Focus:
The history needs to focus on:
The most important first step is to better define the "collapse" with the first questions considering whether this was an episode of pre-syncope or syncope. An accurate description needs to be obtained from the patient and if possible a witness.
Further questioning should focus on the precipitating factors which must include a history of exercise, medications, last oral intake and alcohol. The duration of the episode and the duration of recovery must allow be elicited.
A directed history of the collapse allows the clinician to begin to categorise the event into the differential diagnoses with features to argue for and against the differentials.
Physical Examination:
Physical examination should then be targeted at further differentiating the four most likely causes. In this case, the physical examination has revealed a loud ejection systolic murmur. This physical finding further defines the most likely cause of collapse as cardiac in nature. The combination of history and physical examination makes the most likely diagnosis aortic stenosis (AS).
Other clues to the presence of AS on physical examination include:
Differential Diagnosis - Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy:
The differential diagnosis includes hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. On physical examination the following would be found in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy:
Initial investigations based on the history of syncope and a murmur of AS include:
Eventually, cardiac catheterisation will be needed to measure the gradient across the aortic valve and assess the coronary vessels in preparation for surgery.
By Age Group:
| Murmur | Symptoms | Peripheral Signs | Examination of Precordium | Auscultation | Signs of Severity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitral Stenosis |
|
|
|
|
|
| Aortic Stenosis |
|
|
|
|
|
| Aortic Regurgitation |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mitral Regurgitation (Chronic) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mitral Regurgitation (Acute) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
Definitive Treatment:
The only definitive treatment for aortic stenosis is aortic valve replacement. The development of symptoms due to aortic stenosis provides a clear indication for replacement. For patients who are not candidates for aortic replacement, percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty may provide some symptom relief.
Medical Management Options:
The medical treatment options are limited in symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis who are not candidates for surgery. In patients with pulmonary congestion, cautious use of digitalis, diuretics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors might attempted, whereas beta-blockers might be used if the predominant symptom is angina. In any case, excessive decrease in preload or systemic arterial blood pressure should be avoided.
Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of bacterial endocarditis is no longer recommended in patients with isolated valvular aortic stenosis.
Severity-Based Management:
The management of AS depends upon the severity of the stenosis. The development of symptoms such as angina, syncope or increasing breathlessness are indications for objective evaluation of the severity of the stenosis and prompt consideration of aortic valve replacement.
Indications for Surgery:
All patients with AS should be kept under observation. However the development of any further problems such as angina, syncope, symptoms of low cardiac output or cardiac failure indicate that surgery is promptly indicated.
Application to This Case:
Unfortunately, the woman in this case has clinical signs of heart failure and a history consistent with syncope. An aortic valve replacement needs to be considered.