Category: Medicine | Discipline: Rheumatology | Setting: General Practice
Case
Miss Sophie Williams, a 34-year-old office administrator, attends her GP surgery for the fifth time in 6 months with persistent widespread pain. She describes aching pain "all over," particularly affecting her neck, shoulders, lower back, hips, and thighs. The pain has been present for over 8 months and is worse in the mornings. She reports extreme fatigue, stating "I feel exhausted all the time, even after a full night's sleep." She has trouble concentrating at work, describing "brain fog" where she forgets things and struggles to focus. She has difficulty sleeping, taking hours to fall asleep and waking frequently during the night feeling unrefreshed. She also reports frequent headaches, IBS symptoms (alternating constipation and diarrhea, abdominal bloating), and feels low in mood. She has tried paracetamol and ibuprofen with minimal relief. She feels frustrated that "no one can find what's wrong" after previous blood tests were normal. She works full-time but has had to reduce her gym attendance due to pain and fatigue, which she used to enjoy.
Past Medical History: IBS (diagnosed 3 years ago), migraines, anxiety Medications: Mebeverine PRN, sumatriptan PRN, occasional ibuprofen Social History: Works full-time in office, lives alone, non-smoker, minimal alcohol Family History: Mother has "chronic pain"
Vital signs: BP 118/72 mmHg, HR 76 bpm, Temp 36.7°C. Examination: Multiple tender points on palpation (neck, shoulders, elbows, hips, knees), normal joint examination with no swelling or deformity, full range of movement (though patient reports pain), normal neurological examination, no muscle weakness or atrophy
Self-Directed Learning Questions
Definition of fibromyalgia:
Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain syndrome characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and cognitive dysfunction ("fibro fog")
It is a clinical diagnosis - there are no specific diagnostic tests or biomarkers
Considered a disorder of central pain processing/sensitization - the nervous system amplifies pain signals
More common in women (female:male ratio ~9:1), typically presents age 20-50 years
Prevalence ~2-8% in general population
Evolution of diagnostic criteria:
1990 ACR criteria (American College of Rheumatology):
Required widespread pain (all 4 quadrants of body + axial skeleton) for ≥3 months
Required ≥11 of 18 specified tender points on digital palpation
Limitations: Tender point examination was subjective, time-consuming, poorly reproducible; criteria didn't capture other core symptoms (fatigue, cognitive issues, sleep problems); created perception of "tender points" being diagnostic rather than part of spectrum
2010/2011 ACR criteria (revised, still widely used):
Removed tender point examination (recognized as unreliable)
Introduced two key measures:
Widespread Pain Index (WPI): Number of painful body regions (0-19) from checklist
Plus extent of somatic symptoms (headaches, IBS, numbness, etc.)
Diagnostic criteria:
WPI ≥7 AND SS score ≥5, OR WPI 3-6 AND SS score ≥9
Symptoms present for ≥3 months
No other disorder that would explain the pain
Advantages: Can be used in clinical practice and self-report; captures broader symptom profile; more objective; recognizes fibromyalgia as multi-symptom disorder, not just pain
2016 revision (fibromyalgia criteria):
Generalized pain (defined as pain in ≥4 of 5 regions) required
Combined and clarified the WPI and SS score requirements
Reinforced that fibromyalgia can coexist with other conditions
Key changes in understanding:
From peripheral to central: Shift from viewing fibromyalgia as muscle/tissue problem to recognizing it as central nervous system disorder (central sensitization, abnormal pain processing)
From exclusion to recognition: Previously a "diagnosis of exclusion"; now recognized as distinct clinical entity that can coexist with other conditions (e.g., RA, lupus)
Dimensional rather than binary: Fibromyalgia exists on a spectrum - "fibromyalgianess" can vary in degree
Biopsychosocial model: Recognition that biological, psychological, and social factors all contribute to development and maintenance
Legitimization: Increasing acceptance as "real" condition (historically dismissed as psychosomatic or malingering)
Contemporary understanding - pathophysiology:
Central sensitization: Enhanced pain processing in CNS - "volume turned up" on pain signals
Reduced descending pain inhibition (pain suppression systems don't work properly)
Neurotransmitter abnormalities: low serotonin, noradrenaline, dopamine; high substance P (pain transmitter) in CSF
Altered brain connectivity and activity on functional imaging
Sleep architecture abnormalities (reduced deep sleep, alpha-wave intrusion into sleep)
Possible genetic predisposition (family clustering, gene polymorphisms in pain pathways)
Clinical application: Diagnosis is clinical, based on characteristic symptom pattern (widespread pain, fatigue, cognitive issues, sleep disturbance) lasting ≥3 months, after excluding other causes. Modern criteria facilitate diagnosis without requiring tender point examination.
Core clinical features of fibromyalgia:
1. Widespread chronic pain (cardinal feature):
Diffuse, aching, sometimes burning quality
Affects multiple sites - often described as "hurting all over"
Typically axial (neck, back) and proximal limbs (shoulders, hips)
Worse with activity initially, but also worse with prolonged rest/inactivity
Variable intensity - fluctuates day-to-day, can have flares
Allodynia (pain from normally non-painful stimuli) and hyperalgesia (exaggerated pain response)
2. Fatigue (present in >90%):
Severe, persistent, unrelieved by rest
"Exhausted all the time"
Not proportional to activity level
Can be as debilitating as the pain
3. Sleep disturbance (present in ~75%):
Non-restorative sleep - "wake up more tired than when went to bed"
Difficulty falling asleep, frequent waking, early morning waking
Side effects: Dizziness, drowsiness, weight gain (common and can be significant), peripheral edema, dry mouth, blurred vision, cognitive impairment/"brain fog"
Weight gain limits long-term use in many patients
Advantages: Also improves sleep and anxiety; can be effective when other options fail
Contraindications: Caution in renal impairment (dose adjustment needed); potential for misuse (controlled drug in some countries)
4. Gabapentin (anticonvulsant, similar to pregabalin):
Dose: Start 300mg at night, can increase to 1800-2400mg/day in divided doses
Evidence: Some evidence for efficacy (less robust than pregabalin); often used as alternative to pregabalin
Side effects: Similar to pregabalin (dizziness, drowsiness, weight gain, edema)
Advantages: Cheaper than pregabalin in some settings
Medications with MODERATE evidence (second-line options):
Other antidepressants:
Milnacipran (SNRI): FDA-approved for fibromyalgia in US; similar efficacy to duloxetine; not available in all countries
Cyclobenzaprine (muscle relaxant, structurally similar to amitriptyline): 10-30mg at night; improves sleep and pain; very sedating
Fluoxetine, paroxetine (SSRIs): Weaker evidence than SNRIs; may help comorbid depression but less effective for pain than SNRIs/tricyclics
Medications with LIMITED/NO evidence or NOT recommended:
Paracetamol: No good evidence; may provide minor short-term relief; generally ineffective as monotherapy
NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen): Fibromyalgia is not inflammatory condition; NSAIDs largely ineffective; may help if comorbid inflammatory condition or short-term flare
Opioids (codeine, tramadol, morphine, etc.):
NOT recommended - no evidence of efficacy in fibromyalgia
Benzodiazepines: Not recommended - no evidence for pain/fibromyalgia; risk of dependence; may worsen sleep architecture; reserve only for short-term anxiety management if needed
Corticosteroids: No role in fibromyalgia (not inflammatory)
Cannabinoids: Insufficient evidence currently; some patients report benefit but formal trials show limited/no efficacy
Practical prescribing approach:
Step 1: Choose initial medication based on:
Predominant symptoms:
Sleep problems prominent: Amitriptyline or pregabalin (nighttime dosing)
Comorbid depression/anxiety: Duloxetine
Daytime fatigue (want to avoid sedation): Duloxetine
Comorbidities/contraindications: e.g., avoid amitriptyline in cardiac disease, elderly
Patient preference, previous experience
Step 2: Titrate dose slowly
Start low, increase gradually to minimize side effects
Allow adequate trial at therapeutic dose (6-8 weeks minimum) before judging efficacy
Step 3: Assess response
Meaningful improvement = ≥30% reduction in pain AND improvement in function/quality of life
If effective: continue at minimum effective dose
If ineffective or intolerable side effects: taper off and try alternative medication (different class)
Step 4: Combination therapy (if needed)
Can combine medications from different classes (e.g., amitriptyline + duloxetine, or pregabalin + duloxetine)
Some evidence for additive benefit, but also increased side effect risk
Use lowest effective doses of each
Limitations and realistic expectations:
Modest efficacy: Even in responders, typically only 30-50% symptom reduction; complete pain relief is rare
Side effects common: May limit use or adherence; need to balance benefits vs. side effects
Individual variation: No way to predict who will respond to which medication - trial and error approach necessary
Not curative: Medications manage symptoms; do not address underlying condition
Long-term use: Unclear optimal duration; many patients continue long-term, but periodic reassessment of need is appropriate
Cost: Some medications (especially pregabalin, duloxetine) can be expensive
Key messages:
Medications should be part of comprehensive management, not sole treatment
Combination of medication + exercise + psychological approaches = best outcomes
Set realistic expectations - modest improvement, not cure
Avoid opioids and benzodiazepines
Regular review to assess ongoing need and manage side effects
Prognosis of fibromyalgia:
Natural history:
Chronic, fluctuating course - symptoms wax and wane over time with flares and remissions
Spontaneous complete remission is uncommon (occurs in \<25% of patients)
Many patients show some improvement over time, especially with appropriate management
Severity and impact vary widely between individuals
Functional outcomes:
Significant impact on quality of life: Pain, fatigue, and cognitive dysfunction affect daily activities, work, relationships
Work disability: Higher rates of work disability and sick leave compared to general population; however, many patients continue working (with accommodations)
Not progressive or degenerative: Fibromyalgia does not cause tissue damage, deformity, or organ failure (unlike RA, lupus)
Not life-threatening: Does not shorten life expectancy
Factors associated with better prognosis:
Younger age at diagnosis
Higher education level
Active coping strategies (vs. passive/catastrophizing)
Regular exercise and physical activity
Engagement with treatment and self-management
Good social support
Employment/maintaining work
Absence of severe depression or other psychiatric comorbidity
Factors associated with poorer prognosis:
Severe baseline symptoms
Long duration before diagnosis
Multiple comorbidities (especially psychiatric)
History of trauma/abuse
Litigation/compensation-seeking
Passive coping, catastrophizing
Social isolation, poor support
Realistic outcome expectations:
Goal is symptom management and functional improvement, not "cure"
Most patients can achieve meaningful improvement in symptoms and quality of life with appropriate multimodal treatment
Return to pre-fibromyalgia functional level may not be possible for all, but many can work, maintain relationships, and have good quality of life
Self-management strategies become lifelong tools
Key challenges in managing fibromyalgia patients:
1. Diagnostic challenges:
No objective test - relies on clinical assessment
Overlap with other conditions (chronic fatigue syndrome, depression, other pain syndromes)
Delayed diagnosis common (average 2-7 years from symptom onset) - patients see multiple doctors, undergo extensive testing
Persistent stigma and dismissal by some clinicians ("it's all in your head")
2. Complexity of condition:
Multisystem symptoms - pain, fatigue, sleep, cognitive, mood, GI, etc.
Comorbidities common - requires management of multiple conditions
Heterogeneous presentation - "fibromyalgia" encompasses diverse patients with varying symptoms and severity
3. Treatment challenges:
No single effective treatment - requires multimodal approach
Modest efficacy of available treatments - many patients don't respond to first-line therapies
Side effects limit medication use
Non-pharmacological treatments (exercise, CBT) require active patient participation, time, and resources - not always available or acceptable to patients
Trial-and-error approach necessary - frustrating for patients and clinicians
4. Patient factors:
Illness beliefs and expectations: Patients seeking "cure" or explanation of exact cause (which we can't provide)
Catastrophizing and passive coping: "Nothing will help," helplessness
Secondary gain issues: Disability benefits, avoidance of work/responsibilities (in minority of patients)
Multiple previous failed treatments: Leads to demoralization, skepticism about new approaches
Doctor-shopping: Seeking the doctor who will "fix" them or provide desired diagnosis/treatment
5. Healthcare system challenges:
Limited access to multidisciplinary services (physiotherapy, psychology, pain clinics)
Time constraints in primary care - comprehensive fibromyalgia management is time-intensive
Lack of specialist expertise in fibromyalgia
Pressure for quick fixes (medication prescriptions) rather than behavioral interventions
6. Psychosocial challenges:
Stigma - "invisible illness," others (family, employers) may not believe or understand
Social isolation - reduced ability to participate in activities
Relationship strain
Financial impact - work disability, healthcare costs
Approach to frustrated patients with previous failed treatments:
1. Therapeutic alliance and validation:
Listen and validate: "I believe your symptoms are real and I understand how difficult this has been for you"
Acknowledge frustration with previous failed treatments
Avoid dismissive language; show empathy and commitment to working with them
Continuity of care: Regular appointments with same clinician builds trust
2. Review and reframe:
Review previous treatments: What has been tried? At what doses/duration? Why discontinued?
Often medications were tried at inadequate doses or for insufficient duration
Or stopped due to side effects that might be manageable with slower titration
Identify any partial responses: Even small improvements are worth noting and building on
Reframe goals: Shift from seeking "cure" to improving function and quality of life
"We may not eliminate all your pain, but we can work on helping you do more of the things that matter to you"